Jesus’ Resurrection
Jesus’ resurrection is explained in the book In the Heart of the Earth: The Secret Code that Reveals What Is In the Heart of God” (pictured to the right) with some interesting new insights and significant scriptural discoveries.
Here is a summary of the main points of the book. The book gives much more detail, the reasoning and scriptural support, and references from the writings of others. Topics on this site with new or additional material beyond what appears in the book are indicated (with links) in and following the summary below. This is an ongoing study and new material will be added from time to time.
Chapter 1 introduces the topic of Jesus’ resurrection by means of a story that gives the context. It also describes the method used – that of allowing the Bible to define its own terms by determining how it uses words. An example of this – the meaning of “heart” is given on this site’s home page.
Chapter 2 discusses how inclusive reckoning counts portions of time as a whole unit of time (day or year). But even using that you cannot get three days and three nights between a Friday afternoon crucifixion and a Sunday morning resurrection.
Jesus compared His experience to that of Jonah yet Jonah was not dead.
Jesus did not use the terms “grave” or “tomb” which He could have if that was what He meant. The time period was not referring to how long He would be buried.
Word studies show that the Greek word “kardia” is never translated in the New Testament with the meaning of the middle or center of anything. The Greek word “ge” can mean the occupants of the earth. Jesus’ use of these words in parables points to a different meaning for “in the heart of the earth.”
Being “in the heart of the earth” was a reference to being within the mind (will or control) of man.
The three days and three nights started after Jesus’ betrayal following the dinner at Simon’s house on Tuesday evening. This would put the end of the time period on Friday afternoon.
The exact time period is not the most important aspect of the sign. In fact, some gospel references to the sign of Jonah do not even mention the time.
Chapter 3 demonstrates that the Greek word “sabbaton” means the seventh-day Sabbath. The phrase “mia ton sabbaton” means “one of the sabbaths” referring to the time interval between Passover and Pentecost. It has been mistranslated “first day of the week” in verses referring to Jesus’ resurrection in support of the idea of Sunday sacredness.
The original word “sabbaton” is in the plural form. It does not make sense to translate it into the singular word “week.”
Chapter 4 points out that Jesus said that what is commonly referred to as the last supper was a Passover observance and that there were sectarian differences in understanding of festal timing. References to a day of preparation prove that the crucifixion was on a Friday. The Wednesday crucifixion theory is briefly examined. Read 20 reasons why the crucifixion of Jesus Christ could not have been on a Wednesday.
The procedures of harvesting grain for the Feast of First Fruits point to the initial harvest (resurrection) being just after sunset followed by a waving of the grain offering the next morning. A study of uses of the word “after” in key verses shows that this offering happened on the seventh-day Sabbath not on the first day of the week. Pentecost was and is always on a seventh-day Sabbath.
The removal of Joseph’s bones from his tomb in Egypt was parallel to Jesus’ resurrection.
Chapter 5 shows by carefully examining John’s wording that the supper at Simon’s house was on Tuesday evening.
The women could have purchased the spices before the crucifixion. They did not come to embalm Jesus’ body in the morning (that had already been done) but merely to anoint Him.
The “next day” when the guard was posted started at sunset Friday evening.
Chapter 6 reminds us of the many signs that Jesus was the Messiah proving that “there shall no sign be given to it but the sign of the prophet Jonas” must be referring to a sign of something else. See other evidence that He was the Messiah.
A deeper look at the context of Matthew 12 shows that the significance of the sign Jesus offered was meant to reveal something in our hearts and in the heart of God.
Chapter 7 gets to the heart of the matter, revealing the character of God in a better way than is usually understood. It identifies a principle showing that God does not use force and that it is Satan, the destroyer, who is behind the destruction and suffering that comes about when God, in honoring our free will, removes His presence and protection.
The sign was all about God’s character of love and His honoring of man’s free will. He so highly values man’s God-given right to exercise free will that for a period of time – “three days and three nights” – He allowed His Son to be “in the heart of the earth” (within the control of man) to do with Him as they pleased even to the point of crucifying Him.
Remember, these are just a few highlights from each chapter. There are other important details in the text of the book.
Since the book was published some additional items have been researched or expanded on. These are all listed and briefly explained at Jesus’ Resurrection Addenda with links to each.
April 18, 2012 @ 9:14 pm
Plan A
Jesus said to Nicodemus plainly that he would be lifted up and EGW says that meant on the cross. Jesus came to this world willingly knowing what his fate would be. There are so many references in the Bible to his crucifixion that I don’t see a way around it. As far was what God’s original intention was-well that was for Adam and Eve not to sin in the first place. The plan B was for Jesus to come as a sacrifice. Satan invented His death and he willingly offered himself. God simply knew ahead of time what the devil would do and put it in prophecy. We can’t speculate on what God was thinking. What we do know is that he came and offered His life. I’m thankful. I think it’s easy to get lost in details that aren’t of much importance..perhaps??
June 6, 2012 @ 9:10 pm
Plan B
I don’t agree with your plan A and then B for Jesus’ death. There’s nothing in prophecy that says he’d be sacrificed on the temple altar by a priest. Jesus told Nicodemus how he would die and told the disciples he would be crucified. The Old Testament prophecies point to his humiliation-being whipped, beard plucked out and crucified with the “engraven on the palms of my hands” for one example from Isaiah. I have to say that God’s plan A was for all the people to accept him as Messiah; that is clear from the Bible and because of His foreknowledge he knew what they would do. As far as God’s plan A to make Him a sacrifice on the altar with a high priest officiating is nothing other than speculation. (Idaho)
June 6, 2012 @ 9:11 pm
Thank you for your comments. When others contribute thoughts it brings fresh thinking to the subject and helps us progress towards the best understanding.
You may be correct. Certainly God did not foreordain that people should sin and reject the Messiah. It seems that He adapts His ways to man’s actions which He would do if He is honoring man’s free will.
Here are a few thoughts. The reasons (and I think they are reasonable) that I suggest that plan A for Jesus’ death was not crucifixion are:
* “The wages of sin is death …” (Rom 6:23) not crucifixion.
* God did not invent crucifixion, the Romans did. To say God did would totally distort the truth of God’s character.
* No sacrificial lamb (all of which pointed to Jesus’ death) was ever nailed to a cross. They were all killed in a humane manner.
* Abraham laid his son Isaac on an altar for the sacrifice. This was the clearest picture we have of what the Divine Father and Son would go through.
Here are some related thoughts. The sanctuaries on earth including the temple at the time of Jesus’ death were models of the true sanctuary in heaven. (Heb 8:2). The sacrifices in the earthly tabernacle were pointing to the true sacrifice of the heavenly system which it would seem should take place on a corresponding altar of sacrifice in the heavenly sanctuary. Actually, the cross of Calvary on earth ended up being the altar of sacrifice of the heavenly sanctuary.
“Heaven is my throne, and earth is my footstool: what house will ye build me? saith the Lord: or what is the place of my rest?” (Acts 7:49)
January 15, 2013 @ 9:14 pm
Reference to Plan A in Old Testament
Actually, Jose, there is a possible reference to Plan A in Psalms where it is speaking of the Messiah and then makes reference to binding the sacrifice to the altar:
“Blessed be he that cometh in the name of the LORD: we have blessed you out of the house of the LORD. God is the LORD, which hath shewed us light: bind the sacrifice with cords, even unto the horns of the altar.” (Psa 118:26-27)
January 26, 2015 @ 9:11 pm
the cross was never a set back but it was a set up that we may be saved.
the power of God is never in theology bt in revelation and truth